(Probably) First Heavenly Sword review - This is next gen!

[*~Onna76~*]

iclim4 said:

9's accross 4 reviewers is pretty good.. but where the hell is the 10gb worth of music? i thought they said 15 hrs last time... well atleast the storys epic,
MGS3 was pretty short but its story made it my favorite game.

*~Onna76~* said:
"A bit too short - less than 10 hours

Enemies aren't differential enough - only few models

It would be nice to have more bosses

Lack of secrets

Some issues with collision detection"

And then a 10? That review is a joke! You don't give a 10 to a game if you mention so many issues, a 10 is for a complete perfect game, with hardly anything negative to say about. I've seen reviews with 9 scores with only 1 or 2 small negative comments mentioned about the game. The first two comments already are not worth a 10 "for any game".

ahahah ^^ it got 9's not tens..
the experience is prolly reallly good warranting a 10, but theres just those issues.

It says 9+ from each reviewer, even then, a game less then 10 hours of gameplay, with enemies you can slash within a blink of an eye, sounds more like around 8 but not that high. I think they've scored the game so high because the graphics were blinking in their minds while they were writing the review. Play Magazine gave it a 10 (as well), therefore I've entirely lost my trust in reviewers that way. As games are made by people, and people aren't either... no game is completely perfect.