| konnichiwa said: Hmmm there is something about Killzone and Sony I never will understand. I loved Killzone very much but Killzone was one of the big hypest games on the PS2 that did not do what everyone thought SELLING. So why did Sony make this game a big hype when the first one in fact sucks in many their opinions? |
That is like saying that they shouldn't have remade GTA into 3d because the series was less popular before it was remade than after. The PS2 could not run an FPS right, which is why Killzone sucked. Most of the reviewers said they liked what the game had to offer storywise, atmosphere-wise, etc. It just couldn't be done correctly on the PS2. Considering this was the most-hyped game on gametrailers before E3, and that it blew everyone at E3 away, I don't think Sony was mistaken in reviving this franchise.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
