| bugrimmar said: yeah, there is no game that deserves 10/10, 100/100, 5/5, or whatever. Why? because if you think about it, scores like these imply absolute perfection. Like there is not a single mistake in the entire game. If there is even a single minor glitch in the game, it's no longer a 10. it becomes a 9.9. Why? because it's no longer perfect. It has a blemish. Even if it's tiny, it removes the perfection of the game. Read this: perfection is absolute. there are no mistakes. and there is no game out there, and there will never be a game that will have no mistakes. period. giving a game 10/10 is simply overhyping and fanboyish. |
...You cannot be serious. Let me check something.
Oh my God you are serious.
Look, a 10/10 and 5/5 do not imply perfection. In reasonable scales like those, they denote tiers of quality. A 5-star game is as good as it gets, but it by no means implies perfection. it simply means that it is supposed to take its place as one of the best games there is.
Read this: a 10/10 and a 5/5 does not even imply that something is flawless. Art is not like your elementary school homework or your college English essays. There is no hard line for perfection and no one pretends that there is. There are only tiers of subjective quality.
Going by your logic, on a thumbs up/thumbs down scale, a game should never get a thumbs up, because a "perfect score" implies perfection.
You go to your room and think about what you've done.
