| kergeten said: @Naslodecoy, the 240 fps is not useless, that type of thinking is quite harmful, just because it goes against you perception of what works and what doesn't,doesn't mean it doesn't work, it clearly had an effect on the audience, so the human eye clearly can perceive this difference. To put it in perspective,most scientists before the airplane had all sorts of mathematical equations and theories, proving without a doubt that heavier than air flight is impossible, even though birds were proving them wrong. So I would refrain from spouting such ignorant views, just because you don't understand how it works, doesn't mean it doesn't work. |
Ignorant? I do believe I mentioned that I still think it is quite impressive. The article is basically a press release, so I wouldn't trust these reactions from the audience.
The thing is, these exercises are not practicle for any of today's consumers. Yes, the human eye interrepts brightness/motion/color at different rates (I think), but they had to build a god knows how much display at 19" to display 240 FPS. Something that is completely nominal at best. However, it's still impressive.
Can I be impressed by a technology and still proclaim it uselss? Yes. It's like if I had boobs on my chest. I'd be rather impressed. Of course, they'd also be impracticle.
