HappySqurriel on 28 March 2007
Kwaad said:
I sure hope that Spiderman3 for the PS3 didnt cost more than spiderman2 for PS2... cause it sure dont look much better. 
EDIT: This is in refrence to the game costs how much you put in it. You put 50mil in it... it will be a great, beautiful game. You put 100,000 in it... it will... not. On any console.
I choose spiderman because it was the only series I could think of which would have (practically) the same environment in 3 generations ...
The unfortunate fact is that as you approach photo-realism in a game you also need to approach a level of realistic variation in the environment. If you reused as much content on a PS3 game as you did in a N64 (or even PS2) game you would end up being destroyed in reviews and having a game which sold poorly.
EDIT: This is in refrence to the game costs how much you put in it. You put 50mil in it... it will be a great, beautiful game. You put 100,000 in it... it will... not. On any console.
