By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EaglesEye379 said:
Spankey said:
TWRoO said:
Spankey said:
@ lol mature
It's a remake of a thread mistakingly made in the SONY thread.

@sepisfu, my opinion still stands, if you are looking for Blu-Ray and a console, the PS3 is still the most economical option for now.

Blu ray player for less than £150
http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_ss_w_h__1_4?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=blu+ray+player&sprefix=blu+

Xbox 360 cheapest is now £130

 

 

150 pounds = $200+ does it not?

so 150 + 130 = 280 pounds.

PS3 bundle (with hard drive) = +/-285 pounds 

All in one unit, so it saves space too. for just 5 pounds more.

I'd say thats more economical.

 

 

 

People need to explain to me how adding a feature that people are not interested in makes it economical. First off, hands down if you are a Blu-Ray/DVD collector and big movie enthusiast with a home cinema then PS3 is the best choice. But what do you tell the huge percentage of consumers who are not collectors and barely even have any DVDs?

 

 

for my reply, I will quote tuoyo:

"If I said what I want to say in reply to this post I would get a ban so I would just say it in my head and leave you to imagine what I am saying and also leave you to continue to stew in your ignorance"



Proud Sony Rear Admiral