By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Spankey said:
TWRoO said:
Spankey said:
@ lol mature
It's a remake of a thread mistakingly made in the SONY thread.

@sepisfu, my opinion still stands, if you are looking for Blu-Ray and a console, the PS3 is still the most economical option for now.

Blu ray player for less than £150
http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_ss_w_h__1_4?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=blu+ray+player&sprefix=blu+

Xbox 360 cheapest is now £130

 

 

150 pounds = $200+ does it not?

so 150 + 130 = 280 pounds.

PS3 bundle (with hard drive) = +/-285 pounds 

All in one unit, so it saves space too. for just 5 pounds more.

I'd say thats more economical.

 

 

 

People need to explain to me how adding a feature that people are not interested in makes it economical. First off, hands down if you are a Blu-Ray/DVD collector and big movie enthusiast with a home cinema then PS3 is the best choice. But what do you tell the huge percentage of consumers who are not collectors and barely even have any DVDs?