By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HALOOOOOOOO said:
markers said:
goddog said:
foolpittier said:
If price is the issue you should still get the ps3. After two years of xbox live thats 100 dollars. With a wireless adapter that's another 100 dollars. That makes the cheapest xbox console cost 400 dollars after 2 years. The ps3 is still a much more powerful console that can play games like killzone 2 not possible on the 360. It still has a blu-ray allowing for full HD movies and games like Metal Gear Solid 4 which would require six disks on a 360. And at the end of it all your still let with and 80GB hardrive. cand to buy a hardrive is so much more expensive on a 360 then a ps3.

 

once again why the hell does anyone use wireless gaming for a home console. its slower, people can leach off of you, and it wastes power. wired for home consoles, and wireless for portable devices. 

 

its not much slower, depending on your setup. people cant leach off you if you use passwords like your supposed to. doesnt waste that much power. and some people have to use wireless because they are not close to their modems to connect with the ethernet cable

 

And some people can't use Wi-Fi because their router doesn't have it. Anyways, footpittier was making it sound like you absolutely need an adapter, which you most definitely don't. Most people use the cable anyways. Besides, he says the 360 isn't powerful enough to handle a game like Killzone 2... lol.

 

Yeaa and again with that WIFI sh*t..... what a f*king fanboy ...

Facts :

 - More 360 on the internet

 - LBP bundle has the same cost has its 360 equivalent from ... 2 years ago

 - Twice more games are sold on the 360

- The BR is useless for gaming

- PS3 "Will be huge"

 

 



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.