TheRealMafoo said:
yes, you need rich people and poor people, but nothing says you have to be in any group. So with 20 people, if 5 were going to be poor, the incentive is not to be one of those 5. The advantage of capitalism, is even those 5 live a better life then all 20 if they were in a different form of government. You call yourself poor. but you have a PC, a Mac, an internet connection, a gaming system or you would not be on this site. Poor is a relative term. 500 years ago it meant you didn't get to eat. Today, it means you get basic cable, and not the high end stuff.
|
When you get a big security blanket for the poor, the incentive to be rich doesn't go away. I have enough to survive. I don't get lazy and give up on life and just hang out on the internet. I'm still going to school and trying to better myself. They still have rich people in Europe too. You should want to keep poor people happy so they don't go crazy and start looting and robbing and attacking people.
I don't call myself poor (although 3 years ago I was under the poverty line, I passed it in October 2005, no idea where I am now though, most likely under it again). I'm just broke as hell right now. I was living large the last couple years until I went back to school full-time and stopped working 2 jobs. I saved most of my money for years and then blew 4 grand traveling across Japan and buying a really nice camera for the trip.
Today we're a lot better off than 500 years ago, but there are still poor people starving to death and freezing to death in America.












