kabhold said:
WHY? Weed smokers raise my health care costs. You can pull up a million articles stating that weed does nothing to the body... I can pull up the opposite. Only difference is mine came from a medical database, and yours will come from hightimes.com. And a good % of weed smokers are usually in the bottom tax bracket. Which means I'm footing the bill. Gateway drug. First drug I did...Wasn't the last. People move on to harder drugs and commit stupid/horrible crimes. IT MAKES PEOPLE STUPID.... up to a year or so after they quit (habitual smokers). I hope you really, in your own mind, do not compare not smoking weed legally to slavery, not letting women vote, not letting biracial couples get married, etc. |
If you're worried about health care costs, McDonald's is more to blame for that than weed.
I've never been to hightimes.com, and I'm not a stoner. I'd rather do opiates or booze than weed. (I'm more of a Rush Limbaugh, Cindy McCain, Courtney Love type of drug user.)
If you're opposed to a specific drug because the people who use it are in a specific tax bracket, then are you less opposed to drugs that healthy rich people do?
If you're worried about gateway drugs, it won't be a gateway drug if it's legal.
If you're worried about people being stupid... why? Then shouldn't alcohol and television be illegal?
And yes, I think I can compare many different ways in which majority rules infringes on the rights of minorities, be they a racial minority, or gays, or drug users. I think everybody should be able to do whatever they want with their own bodies, which includes being free, getting married, voting, and doing any drugs they want, if they want.












