| The Ghost of RubangB said: If you vaporize both tobacco and marijuana to get rid of the smoke, which one is worse for you? I haven't heard of anybody vaporizing tobacco before, but I'm sure somebody does it. |
Part of the reason tobacco is so bad is because of everything else they put in cigarettes, chewing tobacco, etc. Some of the varieties that you can roll yourself aren't as bad, but there is still strong evidence that it is pretty carcinogenic. There isn't much conclusive proof that marijuana is carcinogenic, and some evidence has shown that it probably disrupts as many cancerous cells as it creates.
But I think what you are suggesting would be a really good study, although I still beleive tobacco would be the loser.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
