I don't doubt that the screenshots are of lesser quality...maybe due to a higher compression setting.
However what I do doubt and have a real hard time understanding, is what would be the motives for an independent review site to intentionally misrepresent a game...when a written review details "Large, vividly detailed environments" and to top it off, as mentioned before a score of 9! Maybe a more discreet thread title of 'Gamepsot Resistance 2 screens poor' would net you less detractors to your original point than to outright claim bias...







