By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Senlis said:
What about this. Outside of religion, love is simply a set of neurological reactions designed for one thing: procreation. With a homosexual couple, the union does not provide procreation and is not natural. To argue that love is more than a set of neurological reactions designed for procreation, you have to question the concept of evolution.

This is just my thought process. If anyone can provide a proper rebuttal, I will change my mind.

Homosexual activity is actually pretty common in nature.  Obviously heterosexual activity is more common, but there is a lot of documented evidence of homosexuality in animals.  Some biologists argue that it actually creates stronger relationships within clans or packs of animals, and that some types of animals  who do engage in homosexual behavior actually work better in groups with each other than those that don't.

Not to say that their aren't counterarguments to some of the theories for why it happens, but that doesn't change the fact that homosexual activity in nature is relatively ordinary.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson