| Senlis said: What about this. Outside of religion, love is simply a set of neurological reactions designed for one thing: procreation. With a homosexual couple, the union does not provide procreation and is not natural. To argue that love is more than a set of neurological reactions designed for procreation, you have to question the concept of evolution. This is just my thought process. If anyone can provide a proper rebuttal, I will change my mind. |
The simplest retribution I can give you is that non of these, union, love, procreation etc have to be intertwined. I can love my girl dearly, but I sure as hell don't want a baby. Vice versa, there are people who want a baby but can't have it so they seek for instance a carriermother. The carriermother is then infused with the semen of the man from that marriage with absolutely no love between the two of them.
So for gay people, union can be about love, about increasing the chances of adopting a baby (which holds true for most of Europe) and what not but it sure as hell does not directly have to do with procreation.
The Doctor will see you now
Promoting Lesbianism --> 







