Hi everyone. In the article, he basically says that Activision does not care about new games (e.g Ghostbusters & Brutal Legend), and only wants games where sequels can made year after year so Activison can make the most money. I personally think that this is terrible because while some games deserve sequels and even succeed at making good ones companies should keep trying to develop new games to give to the consumers. What do you guys think?
Here is the link to the full article:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2008/11/06/activision-if-we-cant-run-a-game-into-the-ground-we-dont-want-it
I started making videos for youtube; check them out.
Contra (No Deaths): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_OdnbGgupM
Super C (No Deaths): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHoJrHWATgU
Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! (Mike Tyson TKO): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4L7oDV79aw
Systems owned: Atari 2600, NES(3), Top loader NES, Yobo NES, SNES, Sega Genesis, Sega Gamegear, Sega Nomad, Sega Saturn, Nintendo 64, Gamecube, Playstation 2, Wii, PS3 (slim 120 GB), Wii U
You should congratulate me. I destroyed the vile red falcon and saved the universe. I consider myself a hero.
