Groucho said:
How is does this "show" -- being developed on the 360, it has a good framerate on the 360... Are you saying the PS3 version shows a better framerate, because it was developed on the 360 as a lead? Your comment makes no sense in the context of the OP. Squilliam... are you so desparate to flail at something that worries you, to make illogical comments like this one? EA's choosing the PS3 will be interesting. The 360's (and PS3, obviously, as lead platform) game framerates may very well be even better off, starting from the more rigid architecture that the PS3 requires. Its a great thing for everyone -- 360 owners, PS3 owners, EA's review scores, ...everyone but maybe some of the lazier devs who don't want to make their game engines the best they can be.
|
Huh? 360 lead, 360 more stable frame-rate. Do you want other examples of 360 lead projects with better frame-rates or are you happy to leave it at that?
I was just correcting a small error thats all.
Tease.







