HappySqurriel said:
TruckOSaurus said:
HappySqurriel said:
The "Traditional" definition of marriage more or less relates to a man and a woman entering into a partnership in order to raise children with legitimate paternity. This is the predominant view of marriage throughout the world, and has been the predominant view of marriage throughout history, and a relationship that can not generate children does not make sense under this definition ... A man declaring he is menstrating makes as much sense as two men declaring they're married under this definition.
|
So a guy married to a barren woman should divorce her because his marriage makes no sense if you use the "traditional" definition of marriage?
|
Are you really unaware of the fact that that used to happen? I think you need to read more history, I think you should start by reading about Henry VIII of England.
|
Catherine of Aragon was not barren, she had many pregnancies but a lot of stillborn babies. She had a girl (Mary) and a boy who only lived a month or two.