TruckOSaurus said:
Jackson50 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
HappySqurriel said:
The "Traditional" definition of marriage more or less relates to a man and a woman entering into a partnership in order to raise children with legitimate paternity. This is the predominant view of marriage throughout the world, and has been the predominant view of marriage throughout history, and a relationship that can not generate children does not make sense under this definition ... A man declaring he is menstrating makes as much sense as two men declaring they're married under this definition.
|
So a guy married to a barren woman should divorce her because his marriage makes no sense if you use the "traditional" definition of marriage?
|
No, they should not divorce. They should not be allowed to marry in the first place. Only those who have the ability to reproduce should receive the right to marriage.
|
But how could they know? They're not supposed to have sex before marriage?
|
A fertililty test would be required before any couple is granted a certificate of marriage.
