By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jackson50 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
HappySqurriel said:

The "Traditional" definition of marriage more or less relates to a man and a woman entering into a partnership in order to raise children with legitimate paternity. This is the predominant view of marriage throughout the world, and has been the predominant view of marriage throughout history, and a relationship that can not generate children does not make sense under this definition ... A man declaring he is menstrating makes as much sense as two men declaring they're married under this definition.

So a guy married to a barren woman should divorce her because his marriage makes no sense if you use the "traditional" definition of marriage?

 

No, they should not divorce. They should not be allowed to marry in the first place. Only those who have the ability to reproduce should receive the right to marriage.

 

But how could they know? They're not supposed to have sex before marriage?

 



Signature goes here!