By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kyros said:
To be honest, that is something where I see the view. A union between a man and a man (or two women) should have the same taxation etc. as a union between a man and a woman. But a marriage is a religious custom and this is in all religions a thing between a man and a woman.

So remove all taxation (and other) advantages for a marriage and change them so they only apply when a couple (in whichever form) has children.

 

 

The florida law banned the state marriage, not the religious marriage... that's the problem with the ammendment. It prevents even civil unions.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.