By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twesterm on 05 November 2008
Edit Thread
PandaexpressPanda said:
@ matty, oh boy another speculation vid, not even gonna waste my time watching

@tw, they're not AAA games because they're ARCADE GAMES for the 10000th time, they're nowhere near the same level quality as the other games that have high scores, they have high scores based on the fact they're judged on DIFFERENT criteria than a real game... You people would be pissing yourselves if Fat princess was to have a higher meta score than Halo 3 and I would be the first to admit Halo 3 deserves a better score and recognition than a lame PSN or arcade game, they're not even in the same ballpark.

 

  1. Again, you've failed to point out how arcade games don't count.  You keep saying it, we get that, but you never come up with a *good* reason why.
  2. You've come up with criteria on how "real" games are judged and I've countered every one of your criteria.  I guess you missed those like you missed the exclusive thing, huh?
  3. Why would I care if a PSN game beat a 360 game?  I'd be thrilled to have access to another great game.

Just because a game has a bigger budget doesn't mean it's better.