JaggedSac said:
Yes I do, but it isn't in anyway related to their 'knowledge' of the material. It is related to them having similar tastes to me. Why would I care what a knowledgable Pink Floyd fan has to say about Pink Floyd, when I find them pretentious? I do not think that their opinion of Pink Floyd is wrong, I just disagree. Just because someone has watched a shit ton of movies does not make them a movie expert. It just means that they have watched a shit ton of movies. |
Its perfectly normal to respect a band but not like them. I respect Radiohead and there importance in modern musical history, but I don't listen to them.
I am not claiming that someone who has watched a lot of movies is automatically an expert. But do you think there are that many movie experts out there who haven't seen many movies? You can't really have one without the other.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson







