By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 on 04 November 2008
Edit Thread
Jo21 said:
Soriku said:
RyougaZell said:
Phantasia was a god-game.
Eternia was... interesting.
Abyss was a letdown (result: began it 2 years ago, haven't finished it)

PS:
People always say Square milks down Final Fantasy... which makes me laugh, seeing how many tales games are out there.

 

But Square remakes the same game 20 million times. There's only been like what...1-2 Tales remakes (not sure if the Phantasia one was a remake or port. They remade Tales of Destiny and made it uber awesome from before.)?

OT: Yes. Buy Vesperia.

thats not about remades soriku but milking the series.

how many tales have you seen this year soriku?

world, symphonia 2, hearts, mother etc.

same system and similar character design, like cookie cutter RPG.

 

i think after phantasia quality decreased, except symphonia of course.

 

And imo Final Fantasy decreased, increased, and decreased again. Hopefully it increases again with FFXIII. Anyway who would be milking a franchise more. A company that makes a few spinoffs that stay in the same genre as the main one, and are pretty ok in quality ,or a company that makes Chocobo Minigames and a remake or two a year. How many games this year have been released with Final Fantasy in the name, let me see Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: Ring of Fate, Final Fantasy VII Crysis Core, FInal Fantasy Chocobo's Dungeon, Final Fantasy IV, Final Fantasy Tactics A2, and probably a couple more. I'm not saying thsee games are bad they are far from it, but its still more games than you mentioned for the tales series just now, and whose to say those games you mentioned are bad. Both are great series, though I would say the tales series is more consistent in quality, while the Final Fantasy series seems to have some games that top all of the tales games I've played.