World War III

[Tispower1]

Kasz216 said:

Tispower1 said:

Kasz216 said:

I meant that China only had destroyers.  They've got about like 40 destoryers,  a fleet of subs, then like... some frigates which really wouldn't be of too much practical use.

 

 

That was just in reference to your bit about the UK navy slimming down. But subs could definately do some damage, I know ours could! Being the only  nukes we have left

It is slimming down though.  They seem to have been adopting a "Less ships, but better ships" policy.  Which is fine and all, but could prove a problem vs a mass of inferior yet... just large number of ships.

 

Well I only really know a lot about the supercarriers, and we currently have 2 small ones (only 8 Harriers each!) and a spare, and they're being replaced by 2 comparitively large (35 whole planes ) carriers, so in terms of numbers it's basically the same.

However in relation to our navy, this always makes me smile:

Ironically, she could carry more aircraft than our current ones