By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NYANKS on 04 November 2008
Edit Thread
ZenfoldorVGI said:
NYANKS said:
 

Okay, so your point is that reviewers are not pro 360, correct?  I agree with that, with the obvious exception of sites or reviewers that have obvious bias, but these are not significant places.  Perhaps you should frame your argument differently, because based on responses you're not getting your point across.  I will say reviewers can be pro-hype, if you catch my drift.  But no, there is no "metal gear" conspiracy going on, lol.  I think your message was just lost in the fanboyism, and maybe your wording or aggressiveness.  Just my opinion though.

 

Very astute, and directly on point. I've attempted to change my OP, but I will edit it again after your post. My points include:

1. The article is unneeded damage control for less than perfect reviews(it implies we should ignore the low ones).

2. Reviewers aren't biased against the PS3, with very few exceptions.

3. All that said, personal opinion is what determines the quality of a game.

4. The article is filled with shady statements.

With point 3 added so that I don't imply what someone thought I did, which is: Reviews determine game quality.

I certainly probably did embellish with the 'greatest game ever' argument, except that I have heard it before, in a couple of places, lol. I'm a product of my surroundings.

 

 Eh, it happens, this place can be kind of hostile.  Then again, this IS the internet, and as you know, it's SERIOUS BUSINESS.   ;)