By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Aggression isn't a bad thing. Violent action is however, and no game on earth has ever been proved capable of forcing someone to do that. There are so many flaws with this kind of argument it's astonishing that it is still allowed by these old, out of touch polititions. It's 2008 and we still live in a society where soldiers, people paid to ACTUALLY kill people, are treated like heroes but we are supposed to accept video games will turn wide eyed kids into vicious attackers?

I DO call bullshit on that. If we were to accept the possibility, then we'd need to do the same for anything that could have an effect of people, which means all of entertainment and pretty much most of politics and national policy. The fact that the anti video games lobby never change from their hypocritical stance renders their points permanently invalid in my eyes.



Will you teach me to football?