By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vlad321 said:
Not really. The games were already simple as F***, there is no reason to make them even more accessible at all, and very little room for making it so. An RTS is an RTS and you can't get simpler than SC and WCIII when it comes to RTSes. You can pass by without using any abilities at all even. Just drag a box, drop it around the units you need, and right click on a location and you would finish the campaign.

What the hell?? Blizzard is THE last developer that should be criticized about depth! Every game they've made in the last 10 years had HUGE depth, but still accessible to grandmas and grandpas.

And  why do you care about this news if you don't believe that Starcraft 2 will lose depth?

And I say this: Accessibility does not equal "Less Depth or Quality". Fallout 2 is more accessible than Fallout 1 because they made some changes and added options to make the game easier to learn, yet Fallout 2 even has more depth than it's predecessor. Don't compare Blizzard to Bethesda or Lionhead.