Yeah, I think your right Akuma... he really doesn't understand. But you know I can't help it.
@ Nirvana:
A primary source is the actual evidence. My links were primary sources from the POV that they were the one's who actually make up these stories.
A good secondary source is a scholarly journal, cited article, or cited book. A mass media news story is not a good secondary source.
Stephen Colbert is a comedian. He makes jokes.
New world order can have different meanings to different people. To Woodrow Wilson it was a League of Nations, to Adolf Hitler it was a fascist controlled Europe, Asia, and Africa, to Truman and Stalin it was a bipolar political environment, to Bush 42 it was the multifaceted nature of the post Cold War era, to Bush 43 it is a confused mess. New World Order is not capitalized. It's new world order. It refers to the way in which the major powers of the world interact with one another. New World Order (capitalized) was a group of wrestlers in the WCW, formerly a Turner company (Ted Turner is probably a member of the Bohemian Grove).
Yes, the G7, the WTO, the UN, the IMF, and the various pacts between sovereign nations can be considered international governance. Theory (as in the collection of knowledge, not a hypothesis) of international governance as it is today is going to be way more complex than a few hundred words in a video game forum could do it justice.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
