The "reviews don't matter" argument, as presented by Zenfoldor

[Jo21]

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Jo21 said:
those are WJRPG my stance those game shouldn't get even over 8. but thats another 10 cents
its not like 0.5 points are a huge diffrence

thats why there are many reviews... even if some of them are corrupted there is a average ratio.

look at Little big planet a refresing change from the shovelware casuals nintendo its getting and hardcore FPS that industry pumps out.

it have everything online , co op, multiplayer, awesome single player, impulse creativity.
and today overall one of the biggest score in gamming.

Ok, derailed. Are you telling me that no WRPG should ever get over an 8/10?

Also, look at GTAIV or Halo 3. Rated around equal or higher than LBP. Are these games also where they belong?

You shouldn't base your argument around "I like LBP, and it got good reviews, so I'll defend the review system to defend LBP."

 

my point was 0.5 difference wouldn't make a difference.

you can say people feelings or "hype" affect the scores but that the same for all games, thats why there is a average for all the reviews.

i thought halo 3 was good, same as GTA4 if they got a higher average its because of that... not 100% of the sites are biased the average will show you that.