Mistershine said:
Garnett said:
No,you proved that 1 part of mine was WRONG,not all of i,and i knew that it was wrong but i was too lazy to correct it(to read thru it all and correct 1 minor part)Second if you cant post any tech specs of the PS3 gpu against my arguement you fail!!
So either find a link that proves that im wrong or accept it,And just to prove you wrong even more...
"
PS3 GPU (Graphics Processing Unit):
- RSX @ 550MHz
- 1.8 TFLOPS floating point performance
- Full HD (up to 1080p) x 2 channels
- Multi-way programmable parallel floating point shader pipelines
Bandwidth:
- Main RAM 25.6GB per second
- VRAM 22.4GB per second
- RSX 20GB per second (write) +15GB per second (read)
- SB< 2.5GB per second (write) + 2.5GB per second (read)"
From http://www.vgescape.com/features/84/ps3-specs
|
I'm not saying that the 550mhz figure is wrong, but that info is pre e3 2006. The 2x HDMI is non existant, only 1 10/100/1000 LAN port and less USB ports in the final version. Like I said, I'm not saying you're wrong, but these are the specs for a pre release prototype.
|
Yes and the GPU is the same,If something was differnet then launch games would run horrible,So its confirmed that 360 GPU is slightly better than PS3 GPU?
Also the PS3 CPU is better to get that across.
