By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
axumblade said:
Burgles said:
libellule said:
I m wondering the same :

is it possible for R2 to get better review than GoW2 :

goW2

better gfx - True
10 hour campaign
solid online play - We don't know this yet
not much improvement from GoW1 - We don't know this yet

R2

worse gfx - This is true
10 hour campaign
very very solid online play - We don't know that yet
lot of improvement - first one was rubbish though so how can you make a comparison to GOW2?

I can see some reviewer rating R2 higher because gfx are not everything.

But I m not sure that R2 will get a better average review than GoW2.

Wait and see.

Bold ^

So all in all, what exactly is your point?

If a game is released that is mediocre in ever respect, then the sequel is much improved. That doesn't make it better than another series where the first game was very good and the sequel is improved by a smaller amount than the mediocre game?

The amount of improvement means nothing.

If I give you some cat shit to eat, then I give you some horse shit....Is that "ok"?

I'd prefer a steak myself.

 

Um...You do realize a lot of us are in the beta and we've played the online and so we know the online is really good....

 

...online.

 

Online parts of games do not make a game good,oh wait im wrong look at COD4,Crappy last gen SP with decent MP and its nutted all over by casuals...