axumblade said:
Burgles said:
libellule said: I m wondering the same :
is it possible for R2 to get better review than GoW2 :
goW2
better gfx - True 10 hour campaign solid online play - We don't know this yet not much improvement from GoW1 - We don't know this yet
R2
worse gfx - This is true 10 hour campaign very very solid online play - We don't know that yet lot of improvement - first one was rubbish though so how can you make a comparison to GOW2?
I can see some reviewer rating R2 higher because gfx are not everything.
But I m not sure that R2 will get a better average review than GoW2.
Wait and see. |
Bold ^
So all in all, what exactly is your point?
If a game is released that is mediocre in ever respect, then the sequel is much improved. That doesn't make it better than another series where the first game was very good and the sequel is improved by a smaller amount than the mediocre game?
The amount of improvement means nothing.
If I give you some cat shit to eat, then I give you some horse shit....Is that "ok"?
I'd prefer a steak myself.
|
Um...You do realize a lot of us are in the beta and we've played the online and so we know the online is really good....
...online.
|
Online parts of games do not make a game good,oh wait im wrong look at COD4,Crappy last gen SP with decent MP and its nutted all over by casuals...