By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
heruamon said:
CGI-Quality said:
@ Commando.

What's your problem, why are you acting like you are taking this so personally. This is a FACT not an opinion, EA been said they make more revenue on the PS3 months ago, this is part of the reason that ALL upcoming EA multiplats will be PS3 lead development. You shouldn't take this subject so personally.

ROFLOL...that's pure bunk!  The reason that developers are leading with te PS3 is because it's MORE difficult to program for the PS3, and EVEN MORE difficult to port it over to other platforms, NOT because of sales.  Even the Sony spokesman said so, but i guess you're more informed.  I can assure you that when EA reports for this qtr, the % of sales will not be as favorable to PS3 as last qtr's report.  I'll even go as far as to say neither will Ubisoft's, and it's got nothing to do with undertracking, it's got to do with release sked and revenue reciept.  Fanboys ought ot stay out of financial analysis and stick to deciding who can win between Superman and Hulk..

 

But the sales back up the effort.

EA report this week...we will see how much backing up is provided.  It makes sense for a developer to go PS3 first, but hardly due to sales.  If so, Take Two and Activision should stick with 360 as lead, along with a host of others.  It has to do with game release sked, and when you have a PS3 exclsuive and soccer game that sell better on the ps3 in a time frame, it's little surprise on the results.  Maybe people should take the time to listen to Ubi's CC, rather than fanyboying the $$$.

 



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder