Kasz216 said:
Newt Gingrich falls into that group. That group wanted Palin. The NeoCons wanted Romney. The Bible Thumpers wanted that govoner from.... I want to say minesota... some mid west govoner.
|
But what about people like William H. Buckley Jr.? They can't stand Palin. I guess they are kind of in a fourth category, the "libertarian" Republicans.
But even a lot of your "true" conservatives are unhappy with Palin. I've heard a lot of disquietude from a lot of prominent Republicans, including those like Powell. Although he is kind of a moderate Republican, so that may be a fifth category.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
