Khuutra said:
The operative assumption in your argument is that I'm talking solely about IGN, which is not the case. For many places, a 10 is only given out to games which are considered "perfect". Ludicrous and unwieldy, yes, but still true.
The "or" implies that it is one of these two definitions which applies in any given scenario, not just one. |
Ok, and all I was saying was that the clause before the "or" doesn't make any sense. Not just by IGN's definition, but philosophically, because we all can instantly think of improvements for any game, regardless of whether it's been issued a 10 score. You seem to admit as much by saying it would be "ludicrous and unwieldy"..we are in agreement on that.
I did think you were just talking about IGN's 10 score because of the context of the thread beginning with the initial quote from IGN asking if they could give a game an 11. Turns out we are not in disagreement now that I know that you yourself don't actually think "A 10 means this game is as good as can be"... I guess you were just saying that some sites seem to think that.