Jordahn said:
Yes, you are cherry picking. Remember you said... "It also win both Bonus Rounds - The Orange Box and GTA IV." ...in regards to GTA IV 360 being better than GTA IV PS3. And now you are just making excuses because you cannot refute that other sites and sources have said that the PS3 version of GTA IV is graphically superior while the aveage rating is higher. My successful exposure of your cherry picking is very obvious. This invalidates your credibility. Oh, and in regards to comparison...
"On Sony’s side you will get the more slightly more solid game experience from having a good chunk of data loaded onto the systems hard drive. After the install the PS3 has less lighting glitches and less object pop-ups. The PS3 seems to perform a little better than the Xbox 360 which can be an important to rightfully picky." http://www.extremegamer.ca/multi/reviews/gtaiv.php
"For those who have to decide between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions, we should mention that these flaws are slightly less noticeable in the PS3 game." http://ps3.gamespy.com/playstation-3/grand-theft-auto-iv/869750p3.html
But remember it really doesn't matter beacuse my original point was that most PS3/360 multiplatform games are so close to graphical quality that it really isn't anything to worry about. "Don't make it an issue because it's not. Unless it's some covert way of bashing the competition by cherry picking what favors your console preference..." And I've proven both points. You specificly pick the sources that favor the 360, and when someone exposes your blatant biasness, you make excuses. EDIT: And here is a source that takes a neutral but reasonable stance... "The Xbox 360 version seems to have a deeper color palette and a little less motion blur/bloom, but the Playstation 3 version seems to have less pop-in and sharper anti-aliasing. Both versions have a few framerate hits here and there, but it never seems to drop the game into unplayable territory." http://www.gamingtrend.com/Reviews/review/review.php?ReviewID=1034 ANd another of similar nature... "The gorgeous visuals are stunning on either the 360 or the PS3, although the PS3's graphics appeared to be slightly sharper with less noticeable texture pop, but both deliver the same experience despite the technical differences." |
And what I said wrong?
"Thouse where the only graphical compirations articles I found."
Graphical comparisons articles! Not rewies. All of your links are reviews. OK, it is mine mistake that I didn't search in reviews and I accept it. I focus my searching using google for graphical comparisons, cos I was interested in graphical comparisons only and I think articles that focus on graphical side of the game are more important. Reviewers can't measure points or frame rates by their eyes. If you read eurogamer compiration - PS3 wins in both load times and pop-ups, but loose in more other aspects then 360 version. If for you 31.627fps vs 26.504fps is nothing, for graphical comparison it is. As I wrote you - from IGN review "PS3 has better anti-aliasing" is totaly wrong, cos measures proof that PS3 is noAA and 360 is 2xAA.
Anyway case closed.