By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jordahn on 24 October 2008
Edit Thread
BrayanA said:
Jordahn said:
BrayanA said:
Jordahn said:
...

REALLY??????????????

Guess what? Remember when you also said... "At least PSM is being honest (9/10 for Fallout 3 PS3 version)."???

So I guess the average rating of Gamerankings for GTA IV PS3 is dishonest because it's higher than GTA IV 360 just becasue you quoted three sources (and I'm sure there's more) and I quoted one (and I'm sure there's more.) See... cherry picking... more fanboyism...

Cherry picking?! Really?!

So what is metacritics.com then doing? Cherry picking? Nope my friend...

 

 

You're probably right that MetaCritic isn't cherry picking.  I NEVER said it, I NEVER implied it.  I was referring to you, and you know it because you specificly pick things that are favorable to the 360 while ignoring the other side of the coin.  But like most fanyboys, you try to change the subject because you cannot refute it while it's not about MetaCritic, but you in which I've successful exposed your biasness.

No my friend. I didn't "specificly pick things that are favorable to the 360". Thouse where the only graphical compirations articles I found. If you know more then share with us.

 

Yes, you are cherry picking.  Remember you said...

"It also win both Bonus Rounds - The Orange Box and GTA IV." ...in regards to GTA IV 360 being better than GTA IV PS3.  And now you are just making excuses because you cannot refute that other sites and sources have said that the PS3 version of GTA IV is graphically superior while the aveage rating is higher.  My successful exposure of your cherry picking is very obvious.  This invalidates your credibility.  Oh, and in regards to comparison...

 

"On Sony’s side you will get the more slightly more solid game experience from having a good chunk of data loaded onto the systems hard drive. After the install the PS3 has less lighting glitches and less object pop-ups. The PS3 seems to perform a little better than the Xbox 360 which can be an important to rightfully picky."

http://www.extremegamer.ca/multi/reviews/gtaiv.php

 

"For those who have to decide between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions, we should mention that these flaws are slightly less noticeable in the PS3 game."

http://ps3.gamespy.com/playstation-3/grand-theft-auto-iv/869750p3.html

 

But remember it really doesn't matter beacuse my original point was that most PS3/360 multiplatform games are so close to graphical quality that it really isn't anything to worry about. "Don't make it an issue because it's not. Unless it's some covert way of bashing the competition by cherry picking what favors your console preference..."  And I've proven both points.  You specificly pick the sources that favor the 360, and when someone exposes your blatant biasness, you make excuses.

EDIT: And here is a source that takes a neutral but reasonable stance...

"The Xbox 360 version seems to have a deeper color palette and a little less motion blur/bloom, but the Playstation 3 version seems to have less pop-in and sharper anti-aliasing.  Both versions have a few framerate hits here and there, but it never seems to drop the game into unplayable territory."

http://www.gamingtrend.com/Reviews/review/review.php?ReviewID=1034

ANd another of similar nature...

"The gorgeous visuals are stunning on either the 360 or the PS3, although the PS3's graphics appeared to be slightly sharper with less noticeable texture pop, but both deliver the same experience despite the technical differences."

http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=52075



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.