NJ5 on 22 October 2008
The phrase "erring on the side of caution" seems to be falling out of fashion.
Most of the things which could reduce global warming also have other beneficial side effects, such as reducing dependency on fossil fuels, reducing car usage, phasing out coal power plants (which emit more radiation than nuclear ones), etc.
Why don't developed countries do these things and potentially get a double bonus out of them?
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
