joshin69 on 21 October 2008
Id like to know why the burden of proof would be on anyone else but MS? We know the 360 was faulty to a large degree (looking at the "has RRoD put you off the nextbox" threads, bigger than MS excepted) and know they have said its fixed. So you are saying the burden of proof should now be on the customer because MS are trustworthy and would never say the problem is fixed when its not? Poor you.
assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
