By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ultimate_123 said:
WOW! And the people saying that 360 isn't capable of doing great graphics. Also see Epid being cheeky by having the limited edition advert at the end.

I don't think many people claim this, IMO Kameo was a great looking launch game. Gears of War and Call of Duty 4 both are good looking shooters. Especially Gears gave me a caged feeling for a shooter though, but my biggest complaints were actually with regard to its IMO lacking story line, dissapointing end boss and other sections, game lenght and bad acting performances.

To me however Resistance 2 with its huge bosses and Killzone 2 look graphically well beyond Gears 2. I think Gears 2 will push the 360 to its limits technically and will show a nice upgrade in graphics and technicals in general, it's been 2 years since the original Gears launched, so that's not really surprising.

If you mean to say the PS3 is considered to be more capable graphically and allows for fewer artistic and design sacrifices in general in combination with mature game engines, yes the architecture is more powerful (8 CPUs with very fast dedicated memory vs 3 CPU cores sharing L2 cache) and the PS3 has a default harddrive and Blu-Ray disc to rely on.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales