By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
goddog said:
Jordahn said:

With an imperfect legal system and taking in human nature, this legal disclosure is to protect SONY from the millions of users willing to abuse the legal system. Imagine those millions of users demanding SONY a "piece of the pie" by using a reasoning that SONY owns something to those users at the very least. Because this protects SONY from those users of abuse, SONY should out of respect, honor, and image compensate those specific users for content that SONY decides to specificly use to promote that specific related product.

EDIT: Removed the copy-and-pasted article because onyxmeth posted it.

 

not only does it protect them as you say, but it allows sony to exploit the user base for free labor, much like ireport for cnn, which has already led to several scandels lawsuits and jail terms. honestly i think this might have to be rewritten, because in some states this might be viewed as against the law, nothing unusual about that though contracts are often specialised in some states 

Yeah, and that why I said...

"Because this protects SONY from those users of abuse, SONY should out of respect, honor, and image compensate those specific users for content that SONY decides to specificly use to promote that specific related product."

Here at work, there is a disclaimer that anything sent via email belongs to the company.  More than likely a server issue.  If it belong to someone, that someone has the "right" to set the terms of its use.



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.