1. The producers are full of shit. For example, at one point Miyamoto claimed that the series went: OoT, Zelda, Zelda 2, and then the Adventure of Link. So we chose to ignore that he said that and believe one random statement by another Ninendo producer? How did we decide one was right and another was wrong?
2. If you believe the split timeline, then Majora's Mask immediately follows Ocarina of Time in the split timeline. The timeline Link left This then leads to Twilight Princess. Obviously this creates more issues than just the clothes. For example: Hyrule shouldn't have known that Link in Majora's Mask had ever saved the kingdom.
3. I'm sure you beat Ocarina of Time. Link left with the Master Sword when he was transported away.
4. Link DID kill Ganon at the end of Twilight Princess. There no "Maybe" this time. In Twilight Princess Ganon was impaled, and when he looked to the Triforce of Power to save him it disappeared, leaving him dead. The only way this really fits on a timeline is if it's after Wind Waker, which contradicts an earlier statement that it's between OoT and Wind Waker. In fact, these timeline theories really just go all to hell. There are so few connections between the game that people really just need to learn to accept each game for what it is and nothing else.
There are so many holes it just frustrates me to no end. There IS NO TIMELINE. If there was, it would be so badly concieved I would lose all respect for Nintendo's writers. There are some games directly connected to each other. That is a fact, but the entire series is in no way connected.
