Maybe they can actually make 7.0 an improvement over 6.0 and 5.1 this time...Using Vista is strange because it shows Windows is actually in regression from 2002 when XP started. From the way they are hyping Windows 7 though, listing all these new features, I'm starting to think it's going to be another long ride on the bloatware express.
They should make only 2 versions of Windows. The first should be the Vista+even more crap bloatware extravaganza, and the second one should be a OS pared down from even XP that uses no more then a few hundred MBs of RAM, runs everything cleanly and has NONE of those features like confirming I want to open a program, superfetch with the endless hard drive thrashing, page files that reduce 4GBs of RAM into 2GBs available and all the rest. Is it too much to ask a version of Windows to run small and clean like OSX and many builds of Linux have been able to do for nearly a decade now?
...it probably is too much to ask until they lose some more market share for another crap OS and finally realize that the UNIX lightweight OS express is the way to go.
If you want proof the Vista Bloatware express goes nowhere, OSX is only about 7 or 8 percent behind Vista in market share. Another Vista and Windows will be looking at 3rd place behind OSX and Linux.
PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me
