Skeeuk said:
thats a bit of a strange reasoning, if wkc isnt as good as ff7 then lo is jrpg oof the year. wkc looks to pass lo, lo i got bored with it at start of dvd4 and traded t in. wkc has 2w games in 1, 1 is the story quest, the other is an online dedicated 4player co op, sorry but lo isnt what ppl try to make it out wkc looks better than any current or even upcoming 360 jrpg, so4 looks good but we will have to see how gamers react to these games |
This is why I said in my post in my opinion. I have played so many JRPG's since FF7 and LO is the first to match it. So for me WKC would need to match FF7 quality to be JRPG of the year. See I think LO is the most underated RPG of the last 10 years. While pretty mediocre rpg's (in my opinion) like FF12, FF8 and 10 all get marked high others go by marked slightly lower. This is a crime because for me FF is a series with awesome games (FF7, FF2) good games ( FF1,FF5,FF6,FF9) While the rest are just ok. I'm not scared to say that.
LO was awesome whilr BD was ok. Same company but 2 very different games. I'm interested in WKC because I like Phantasy Star games. And WKC is so similar but on a higher budget. But it will be niche because it wont appeal to people who didnt like Phantasy Star games.
