The console with the weakest processor ALWAYS wins.

[hotrodx]

Onyxmeth said:

blackbird3216 said:

Onyxmeth said:

wfz said:
I love how after the whole Dreamcast matter was settled, we still have people popping in to mention it like 20 posts later.... This is why I love this site!

Not! Lern to reed b4 yew poast u gais. srsly. -_-

It hasn't been settled though. The OP doesn't acknowledge the Dreamcast as part of the 6th generation because it doesn't fit into his argument.

 

 

Who said i didn't acknowlege it. Is it my fault that the Dreamcast is the Only system that was disconinued a full year before all it's competitors arrived on the market? The only place it lasted was Japan. Even though it was still in stock in 2002, there were in the middle of phasing it out. It was doomed before the GC and the Xbox launched.

The problem in that is you've failed to show how a console being phased out before it's competitors come to market is relevant to your original argument. I don't see the connection here. If you acknowledge it's part of the 6th generation, then why won't you acknowledge it's the 6th generation's weakest processor?

 

 

Have to agree. "The console with the weakest processor always wins" is not the same with "The most powerful console has yet to win a generation".