one reason why a certain users sig is full of bull

[tabsina]

in his defense, you really didn't explain it very well.. and i still needed to take a close look at the pic to figure out what the hell you were talking about.. and you did in fact get your calculations wrong

for the benefit of everyone else

Basically he picked 10 reviews from reviewers that had reviewed both the 360 and ps3 review.. rather than all 30 and 15 respectively (i'm not sure why.. it seemed quite a strange thing to do)

then from those 10 reviews, he found that they were all equal, with the exception of gamezone, which had a score of 9.1 on ps3, rather than 9.0 on 360..

therefore he has concluded that on average, all the reviewers thought the ps3 version was 0.01% better than the 360.. this is incorrect however .....

0.1/10 (gamezones score) = 1% difference.. which can easily be told as it is written on the website "91%" and "90%".. then if you devide that by 10, to get an average over all 10 reviews.. it is in fact 0.1% higher, not 0.01%

when all is said and done.. (maybe i'm just out of context of the "sig" in question), but that was a considerable waste of my time