Zucas said:
Your foreign policy expertise is about as poor as Sarah Palin's. It's cute but not funny. don't try to coach me on what you think you know. You look at the world and you see good and bad. I look at the world and I see the inbetweens. Whatever your vested interest is in Israel is silly. You look at the Middle Eastern countries and you see blatantly bad and look at Israel and see blatanly good. You wrong in both ways due to whatever narrow thoughts you got that from. Possibly your religion if I had to guess. Point being this isn't a thing of good or bad nor a thing of will Israel care if they nuke someone or not. They are there to be used anyways. It's just no one has been stupid enough to use them... except America of course. They got off easy unfortunately though. Israel is looking for an excuse to use nukes. Probably going to start stirring up more trouble in the Middle East and dub it as terrorism in their countries and need to do these things to protect their country. The unwinnable wars they will cause will continuously go on while they gain worldly support under the name of fighting terrorism. Sound familiar. Eventually when they have all the support they need people will be begging them around the world to take drastic measure where they assert themselves as the dominant force in the Middle East by making an example of a country with a nuke. The rest of the world doesn't respond against them similar to how no one was going to stop America after they nuked Japan. Israel solves their problem and starts expanding. This is foreign policy and this is what should be going through people's minds not your black and white blotches. I'm not saying the Middle Eastern countries are in the right and Israel is inherently wrong but I'm saying its similar to 911 and the Georgian-Russian crisis. The bigger military countries wait for the smaller ones to screw up so they can intervene. It's classic and it could be happening again. |
Your point holds no real merit.
Where did I say Israel was good and the other countries were bad?
Should a nuke be deployed by Israel there would be no way for even the US to back them in the international world and they would be screwed. Case closed.
Israel doesn't have the population to expand... and by the time they get to this magical scenario your talking about it's likely the majority of the country will be islamic not jewish unless they instigate some sort of racist laws.
Other countries would eaisly stand up to Israel if they nuked people... if Israel did it once they could do it again... and unlike the US which is huge... Israel is small.
That's why the US and Russia were so deadly with there nukes... they were such wide stretches of land... there is no way to conventionally take out everywhere a nuke could be.
If the US was the size of Israel, Russia would of nuked the hell out of it.
