shio said:
Rath said:
shio said:
Yojimbo said:
Shio you are the Blizzard Defence Force. If you are going to accept to be treated like this by a game company so be it. |
So tell me, how is changing from 3 small campaigns to 1 huge campaign and non-linear be a bad exchange? I didn't see anyone complain to Relic when they did it with Dawn of War and Company of heroes.
And the other 2 campaigns will be optional, you are not forced to buy it. It's a win-win situation Imo.
Explain to me why is it bad?
|
Because the other 2 campaigns aren't optional. This game is essentially made for the online play and they said that they're modifying the online with each new campaign. This can be translated as "Hey, we're going to make your version of the game obsolete occasionally and force you to buy it again, enjoy" or alternatively as "We're going to rape your wallet".
|
what the hell.... so your problem is that Blizzard is making expansions????????? Dude, just about every big game on PC has expansions, and every Blizzard game had expansions.
And another thing, expansions would only make SC2 obsolete for the professional players, because for the average joe it won't make SC2 worse if you dont buy expansions...
|
If they release the later games at a much cheaper price (ala expansions) then I'll agree. The impression I got from this 'three SKUs' talk was that they were going to charge full price for all three. I don't want to have to buy one game three times just to get the proper multiplayer - I'd be much more ok with buying one game and two half priced expansions.
