S.T.A.G.E. said:
List of things that MS did better than they did last gen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Came out with a system cheaper than their main competition (without an HD-DVD player attached) 2) Came out a year earlier. 3) Gathered a much larger library 4)MGS (Microsoft Gaming Stuidos published or owned IP rights to) published and gathered more games (Not even counting all of the games they published on PC): Fable series, Halo series (Including chronicles and Halo Wars), Viva Pinata, Gears of War,series, Alan Wake, Project Gotham Racing series, Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero, Crackdown, Blue Dragon, Scene it, Lost Odyssey, Ninja Gaiden 2, Lips, Banjo & Kazooie, Ninja Blade, Forza series and more. 5) Actually gives a damn to procure IP's before they fire developers, so that their needed fanbase wont expand. 6) Has proper pricing and variety for people who want a choice between a low priced or expensive console. 7) Cares more this gen about both quality and quantity in games this gen. where as they didn't understand very well last gen which is why they got destroyed by Sony.
If you check the mass majority of Sony's "TOP RATED GAMES" this gen they are mostly 3rd party. Everything else is wishful thinking and speculation. If you run a check, Xbox 360 has more top rates games between a 10 to 9.0...or even down to an 8.5 than the PS3. 3rd party games still remain the highest on both though. Stop being blinded by fanboyism please. |
very well pointed out... MS is showing much more committment.. and they are not taking anything for granted.. Sony is not committed.. and they are not understanding that if they planned to release all the games in the 3rd or 4th yr of PS3 then they should have released PS3 3 yrs later...
Sony is no more balanced... i wander why they r making games like Afrika, Flower, Aquanaut... they haven't made one game for japenese market which has sold a reasonable number like 200k other than i think Pro Golf 5..
