Gnizmo said:
The example is fine. It is an IP that Microsoft owns. Nintendo (and others) own the Goldeneye IP. Just because it belongs to multiple people does not mean it suddenly is up for grabs. By that logic blu-ray should have no licensing fees since 12ish companies own the rights to it. And Nintendo easily has a win in this one. Goldeneye would make the 360 a more appealing game console to some consumers. Why would Nintendo ever want that? Microsoft is asking them to sign off on a competitive advantage which is just dumb. Just because some programmers were stupid enough to make a game they could not release doesn't mean Nintendo is obliged to hurt themselves by helping a competitor. |
The example isn't fine at all. Microsoft owns Halo fully. Even if Nintendo bought Bungie, they could not get Halo. Goldeneye is shared. Furthermore, its old and doesn't have the market appeal that Halo does. And speaking on that, yeah, with Gears 2, Banjo, Fable 2 and Left 4 Dead due out soon I am sure the game on xbox everyone is dying for is a remake of a decade old classic (not even taking into account this is the xbox 360 - the shooter console)........no I think goldeneye, if it did come out, enhanced or not, would have a minimal impact on the balance of power in the console landscape.