Activision blames Nintendo for Goldeneye not being released

[meehan666]

Gnizmo said:

meehan666 said:

WiiStation360 said:
Here is a good compromise.
Rare creates an identical upgraded Goldeneye for Wiiware, and both system can get the new upgraded version. Everyone is happy.

1. How do we know the Wii can handle an enhanced version of goldeneye (the same way xbox 360 can)?

2. How do we know Rare have the resources to take on a Wii development project?

3. Rare work for MS. Why should they spend resources developing for Wii? Why can't Nintendo except something instead of nothing?

4. If Rare are to develope an enhanced version for Wii, Nintendo should cover some of the development cost.

 

 Why should they settle for anything less than what Microsoft would get? They own the rights, and have no interest in doing anything to benefit Microsoft. Getting a bone thrown to you is not always enough. Supposing this story is true (and I have my doubts) I would say Nintendo is well within their rights to refuse to go into any deal that does not give them an equivalent product for their own service. If Microsoft is unwilling to accept an equivalent game being put on a competitors platform, why should Nintendo accept a superior game being released?

Why should they settle for less? Because they didn't fund any development. Anything they get is a plus for them since they didn't throw any money into the pot. If they want an enhanced version made for their console, they should take some of the massive profits they are making on the Wii and pay for some of the development required to get an enhanced version made for the Wii.